IMO, if the grey tones look tinted, change them until they look good to your eye and calibrate for that. You'll never have a perfect match of any screen to any print, or any screen to any other screen using a different backlight/phosphor technology. I would say you're well into the world in which scientific precision begins to break down and some element of subjectivity needs to be taken into account. This is really the most important point here- A colormunki being a spectro with a grating isn't going to shift color as badly since it's not relying on interagreement of multiple different color filters. Thin film based filter colorimeters (like the i1d3 series, SpyderX or possibly the ColorMunki Smile) are likely to be much more stable. This is in distinct contrast to dye filter based colorimeters, that have a reputation for markedly drifting over a few years. The good news is that diffraction grating based spectrometers such as the ColorMunki/i1Pro/Spectrolino spectro's seem to be relatively slow to drift, as long as they aren't given a severe knock (which could displace the optical path, causing a wavelength shift), and as long as they haven't got excessively dirty or dusty etc. The accuracy depends on the initial factory calibration and the instrument remaining stable over time and any abuse. Display) measurement, since there is no reference source it can use. There is no self calibration for emissive (i.e. Self calibration works for reflective measurement only, since there is a white reference for it to calibrate against. Quote from: GWGill on October 09, 2019, 07:02:03 pm Not really.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |